Obama’s Enemies List: It’s Long

Conservative blogger IMAO has obtained Obama’s official enemies list. Here it is:

* FOX News

* Rush Limbaugh

* Glenn Beck

* Jake Tapper

* General McChrystal

* Joe Biden’s mouth

* The economy

* Brazil

* The Jews

* That guy at Starbuck’s who is always screwing up my order

* The dwarf planet Eris

* Optimus Prime

* Blue pens

* Malia Obama

* All other Nobel Peace Prize winners

* Jesus

* Capitalism

* Liberty

* The Constitution

* Americans

Get a healthy dose of conservative awesomeness at imao.us.

FoxNews Channel Continues To Dominate In Ratings

Some good news for the FoxNews Channel.

And incredibly, the story is in the America-hating, conservative-detesting New York Times.

Bill Carter on Monday reported the network that Obama hates with all his evil soul is destroying CNN and MSNBC in the ratings. In fact, the story says, CNN is dead-last in the ratings, with FoxNews dominating the cable-news industry.

That, of course, is no surprise. The network that keeps liberals and other conservative-hating pricks up at night is far superior to all the others. FoxNews covers stories the other Obama-worshipping networks ignore. It asks questions the others refuse to ask. It investigates stories the others mock.

How the network covers the news is one thing, its opinion shows another. Those opinion shows are what Obama despises so much. Mostly, the hosts are either conservative or conservative-leaning, including Bill O’Reilly, Sean Hannity, and Glenn Beck.

And we all know how much they oppose Obama.

And we know, too, how much Obama hates criticism.

So the man whose feelings get hurt faster than a baby who loses his security blanket started hitting the FoxNews Channel hard, actually directing his henchmen to attack the network’s legitimacy and trying to get the lesser networks to shun the right-wing extremist media organization.

The attacks didn’t work. They made the president look like a bigger asshole than he already is. Made him look foolish, childish. Made him look a damned dictator. An oppressor.

Meanwhile, FoxNews continues to thrive. Its audience has remained faithful, and the tiny segment of the cable-news market that’s dedicated to CNN, MSNBC, and other networks remain true to them. Those followers are called liberals, the kind of people to whom the mainstream media caters.

But to some brain-dead media representatives (only a few remain in the industry who have not fried their brains on Obama worship and liberal idolatry), FoxNews is exactly what Obama has described: a right-wing organization that doesn’t deserve to be included among media giants.

Take this, for example, from CNBC contributor Michae Wolff:

“It’s like what the conservatives and the Republicans did to Democrats,” Wolff told MSNBC’s Chris Matthews. “They said everyone is a liberal. You’re a liberal. You’re a liberal … and essentially, what they’re doing is flipping that back and saying, ‘You’re Fox. Oh, you mean like Fox. Oh, you’re echoing the Fox opinion.’ And the truth is, Fox is not very popular in this country. It may have great ratings, but still we’re talking under 2 million people. It’s a really marginal, somewhat extreme presence in the United States.”

Ok, that’s just stupid. But then again, you have to be stupid to actually patronize a piece of shit like Matthews. I mean, the guy is nothing more than a mouthpiece for the Obama White House and all things liberal. This is a guy who actually admitted getting chills up his legs at the mere sight of the president. He’s either exceedingly gay or has some kind of neurological issue that has tragically gone undiagnosed for quite some time.

Sadly enough, Matthews isn’t alone in his quest to rule the world from a stictly liberal perspective. To mentally challenged people like Matthews, nothing matters except liberalism and condemning to Hell those bad, bad conservatives, with their wicked family values, love of country, and worship of the Almighty God.

According to mrc.org:

—On Sunday’s CBS Evening News, political analyst John Dickerson brushed aside criticism from former Vice President Dick Cheney that the Obama administration was “dithering” on Afghanistan: “…it puts Cheney out there as a kind of boogie man the administration can point to. He’s not terribly popular outside of conservative circles…in some ways, Dick Cheney is a gift for the White House.”

—Good Morning America co-host Diane Sawyer on Tuesday helped promote an upcoming HBO documentary on Barack Obama and allowed producer Ed Norton to gush over the “zen” presidential campaign of the Democratic candidate. Sawyer breathlessly teased the program as “the Obamas behind closed doors. The grandmother who raised him and the man you’ve never seen.”

Sawyer played several clips of the By the People: The Election of Barack Obama, a film that followed Obama and his family during the 2008 campaign. The segment, which ran six and a half minutes, will be supplemented by more promotion on Tuesday’s Nightline. When asked what surprised her about the Obamas, director Amy Rice enthused about “just how normal they were.”

Norton was impressed with the “calm,” “no-drama Obama.” The actor continued, “And in a weird way, when you look behind the curtain with that team, they are really zen. It’s amazing how zen they are.”

One could almost predict the desperately “current” New York Times editor/columnist Frank Rich would devote his Sunday column to try and make Balloon Boy an anti-Republican symbol of something or other, and he doesn’t disappoint.

The result, “In Defense of the ‘Balloon Boy’ Dad,” is even more silly than Rich’s usual fare, playing devil’s advocate for storm-chasing father Richard Heene. Rich found “some poignancy in [Heene's] determination to grab what he and many others see as among the last accessible scraps of the American dream….If Heene’s balloon was empty, so were the toxic financial instruments, inflated by the thin air of unsupported debt, that cratered the economy he inhabits.” Rich is being serious.

Certainly the “balloon boy” incident is a reflection of our time — much as the radio-induced “War of the Worlds” panic dramatized America’s jitters on the eve of World War II, or the national preoccupation with the now-forgotten Congressman Gary Condit signaled America’s pre-9/11 drift into escapism and complacency in the summer of 2001. But to see what “balloon boy” says about 2009, you have to look past the sentimental moral absolutes. You have to muster some sympathy for the devil of the piece, the Bad Dad.

Nine months into Obama’s presidency, everything is still officially about Bush:

Next to the other hoaxes and fantasies that have been abetted by the news media in recent years, both the “balloon boy” and Chamber of Commerce ruses are benign. The Colorado balloon may have led to the rerouting of flights and the wasteful deployment of law enforcement resources. But at least it didn’t lead the country into fiasco the way George W. Bush’s flyboy spectacle on an aircraft carrier helped beguile most of the Beltway press and too much of the public into believing that the mission had been accomplished in Iraq.

And from others:

—Mark Penn at politico.com: 

Republicans suggest that the aggressive move by the Obama White House to take on people and organizations that disagree with it and oppose its policies is an unprecedented abuse of government resources.

This is, of course, nonsense.

The Obama team is engaged in a series of tough legislative and press battles and is stepping up its game, not stepping over the line. And the actions taken by the White House are mild and pale compared with those of the Gingrich and Bush years.

Meanwhile, FoxNews Channel’s ratings are up 10 percent. Obama’s approval ratings are falling faster than Bill Clinton’s pants.

Sweet justice.

American Thinker: White House Picks Fight With Popular Fox News Channel

From Rick Moran:

Never pick a fight with someone who already owns the largest slice of cable news audience.

In the case of the Obama administration, their whining about the “ideological” bent of Fox News rings rather hollow when you consider the laughable bias of their competitors:

Attacking the news media is a time-honored White House tactic but to an unusual degree, the Obama administration has narrowed its sights to one specific organization, the Fox News Channel, calling it, in essence, part of the political opposition.

“We’re going to treat them the way we would treat an opponent,” said Anita Dunn, the White House communications director, in a telephone interview on Sunday. “As they are undertaking a war against Barack Obama and the White House, we don’t need to pretend that this is the way that legitimate news organizations behave.”

Ms. Dunn made this comment with a straight face, less than a week after CNN devoted 5 minutes of air time to seriously “fact checking” a Saturday Night Live comedy sketch.

About those “legitimate news organizations,” Ms Dunn. You were saying…?

The Brian Steltzer New York Times piece continues, unaware of the self-parody Dunn is promoting every time she opens her mouth:

The White House has limited administration members’ appearances on the network in recent weeks. In mid-September, when the White House booked Mr. Obama on a round robin of Sunday morning talk shows, it skipped Fox and called it an “ideological outlet,” leading the “Fox News Sunday” anchor Chris Wallace to appear on Bill O’Reilly’s prime-time show and call the administration “the biggest bunch of crybabies I have dealt with in my 30 years in Washington.”

Ms. Dunn called that remark juvenile and stressed that administration officials would still talk to Fox, and that Mr. Obama was likely to be interviewed on the network in the future. But, she added, “we’re not going to legitimize them as a news organization.”

What is “juvenile,” of course, is ignoring the worshipful coverage Mr. Obama receives on MSNBC with Chris “thrill up my leg” Matthews headlining a prime time lineup that features two ranting, raving lunatics (Olbermann and Schultz) and a snidely partisan refugee from Air America (Maddow).

Funny how she sorta forgot that.

No matter. Every time she or some other administration official opens their mouth in criticism against Fox News, the cable network’s audience goes up. They are on pace to break their own record:
 

“Instead of governing, the White House continues to be in campaign mode, and Fox News is the target of their attack mentality,” Michael Clemente, the channel’s senior vice president for news, said in a statement on Sunday. “Perhaps the energy would be better spent on the critical issues that voters are worried about.”

Fox’s senior vice president for programming, Bill Shine, says of the criticism from the White House, “Every time they do it, our ratings go up.” Mr. Obama’s first year is on track to be the Fox News Channel’s highest rated.

One Fox executive said that the jabs by the White House could solidify the network’s audience base and recalled that Mr. Ailes had remarked internally: “Don’t pick a fight with people who like to fight.” The executive asked not to be named while discussing internal conversations.

Frankly, I can’t figure what the fuss is all about. With about 90% of the media slavishly devoting themselves to promoting Obama and his agenda, this relatively small corner of opposition (at least from prime time hosts and Glenn Beck – not from the straight news division) would seem a gnat to be brushed aside not the target of a White House nuclear assault.

Perhaps Chris Wallace’s observation that they are crybabies rings truer than anyone in the administration will admit.

Democrats Pathetically Hypocritical On References To President

From Bob Weir at americanthinker.com:

 

The “you lie” outburst by Rep. Joe Wilson R-SC) during President Obama’s health care speech last week brought the four-term lawmaker national attention and more than a smattering of hypocritical comments from Democrats.

After 8 years of blistering attacks on President Bush by the top echelon of the Democrat Party, suddenly they’ve become prudish about references to the country’s Chief Executive. How quickly they forget the instances when Bush was booed by the liberal side of the aisle when addressing the Congress in that same “hallowed” hall. Let’s also recall an interview in December 2004 on Meet the Press in which the moderator, Tim Russert, asked Democrat Senator Harry Reid, “When the president talked about Yucca Mountain and moving the nation’s nuclear waste there, you were very, very, very strong in your words. You said, “President Bush is a liar. He betrayed Nevada and he betrayed the country. Is that rhetoric appropriate?”

Senator Reid’s response was, “I don’t know if that rhetoric is appropriate. That’s how I feel, and that’s how I felt.” The Senate Majority Leader went on to say,” People may not like what I said, but I said it, and I don’t back off one bit.” In another interview, just as the president was beginning a five-day good will European tour in May of 2005, Reid referred to Bush as a loser. How’s that for protocol? That remark violated the restraint that the opposition party customarily exercises when a president is abroad, but it was an example of the bitter acrimony that was regularly being spewed by those who are now pretending to be mortified by one comment from one congressman, who, (until last week) was unknown to the rest of the country. Even during the last months of the Bush presidency, Nancy Pelosi, in a CNN interview last year said, “Bush has been a total failure in everything, from the economy, to the war, to energy policy.”

Furthermore, where was the outrage against Moveon.org, the leftwing radical group who compared Bush to Adolph Hitler in a televised ad during the 2004 campaign? The ad used a tape recording of the Nazi leader speaking, while it showed images of Hitler and German military prowess during World War II. At the end of the ad, a photo of Bush raising his hand to take the oath of office was shown. The ad went on to say, “A nation warped by lies! Lies fuel fear! Fear fuels aggression! Invasion! Occupation! What were war crimes in 1945 is foreign policy in 2003.” After the damage was done, Moveon.org issued a statement: “We agree that the two ads in question were in poor taste and deeply regret that they slipped through our screening process. In the future, if we publish or broadcast raw material, we will create a more effective filtering system.” There was no apology to the president and there was no condemnation of the substance of the ad. So, what’s worse; calling Obama a liar, or calling Bush a Nazi war criminal?  

Rep. Wilson violated protocol with his outburst during the president’s speech, but the reaction by the Democrats, in view of their incendiary style of politics, is so profoundly hypocritical, that it’s pathetic. As an example of their feigned outrage, the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee’s webpage has a header that reads: “Hold the GOP accountable; stand against Rep. Joe Wilson’s unacceptable outburst. Calling the President of the United States a liar in front of the nation is a new low even for House Republicans and it deserves the strongest response we can give.” Okay, let’s recap: If the Senate Majority Leader and the Speaker of the House appear on national television and call the president a liar, a loser, and a total failure in front of the nation and the world, even when he’s representing our country on foreign soil, it’s acceptable. However, if an obscure lawmaker from South Carolina does it, he should be destroyed. It appears that Democrats have a bifurcated view of political rhetoric; only they should be able to use it.

Lost in this entire deceptive diatribe is whether President Obama was telling the truth when he said millions of illegal aliens will not be covered in his healthcare plan. The fact is that Republicans have served on committees that considered amendments to the president’s plan which would assure that illegal aliens would not get coverage, but those amendments were defeated by Democrats. Rep. Wilson served on such a committee and came away believing that the president was lying. If he was correct, his outburst may have been the only way to expose legislation that could be disastrous for the future of this country. If he was incorrect, all he did was breach a protocol that has been breached many times before.

Washington Post Columnist Says Right-Wingers Wish For Obama’s Death

Here we go again. A liberal columnist writing for a liberal news corporation lectures us conservatives on racism and hatred.

This time, it comes from Colbert I. King in Friday’s online edition of The Washington Post. He rails against “right-wing ranters” who possess an “extraordinary” hostility toward Obama.

He starts the column by – what else – condemning Rep. Joe Wilson for his now infamous “you lie” attack on Obama, then goes on to justify his opposition to all right-wingers by breaking down the cases of pastors Steven L. Anderson of Faithful Word Baptist Church in Tempe, Ariz., and Wiley Drake of First Southern Baptist Church in Buena Park, Calif., both of whom he claims wished for the president’s death in sermons to their congregations.

If what King says about those pastors is true, it would not surprise me. Some of the most racist white people in America can be found in Baptist churches all across the country. I know, because I grew up in the denomination and saw things most people will never experience in their lives.

The kind of people King talks about in the lead-up to his argument against conservatives represent the worst of humanity. That’s a certainty.

But let me be clear: Not all right-wingers are filled with that hatred. We are not a bunch of non-black racists hell-bent on destroying Obama for non-political reasons. We absolutely do not wish physical harm or death on the president or his family.

And it’s deplorable that King, an African-American, considers all of us who don’t support Obama to be racist white men who preach hate and want for the president’s demise. That is the height of ignorance on his part, the measure of Obama supporters like King who discount others whose beliefs and politics differ from theirs.

Here are pieces of King’s column from Friday’s Post:

—Look back to Obama’s speech to a joint session of Congress Wednesday night and South Carolina Republican Joe Wilson’s crude “you lie” shout. Witness the boorish behavior in the GOP seats.

They are an inspiration to Obama-haters.

It’s not just those calling on God to harm the president who cause worry; consider what comes with the territory.

—Right-wing ranters don’t regard the president as a political opponent. Barack Obama, in their minds, is the enemy. He is, to them, dangerous and harmful to the country.

—From a right-wing talk show host who opposed allowing students to see the president’s education speech: “Make September 8 Parentally Approved Skip Day. You are your child’s moral tutor, not that shady lawyer from Chicago.” And from a parent’s e-mail to a Florida TV station’s Web site: “This is exactly how Hitler rose to power in Germany, by preaching to those most vulnerable members of society.”

Smears? Paranoia? It’s all sweet music to the ears of Lee Harvey Oswald wannabes.

Those comments also do not surprise me. It’s just what Obama’s supporters do. They counter Republican arguments by simply calling us racists and unpatriotic, by calling our ideas antiquated, our beliefs and faith fake.

But where was the outrage from liberals when people wished for Bush’s death? Where was it when they criticized every move he made and every word he spoke?

Admittedly, I’m a bit surprised that people are still coming to Obama’s defense like he’s some sort of mythical creature sent here to save us all from ourselves. I thought the newness of Obama would have worn off by now, that many people would have come to their senses and realized The One is not really The One at all, that he’s merely a mortal with not nearly as much intelligence and good intentions as his supporters have believed.

For the likes of King, Obama’s opponents “hate” him not because of his politics but because of his skin color. I haven’t met anyone yet who “hates” Obama, but I’ve come across plenty of people who just don’t like him – and for reasons that have nothing to do with his heritage.

So, Mr. King, here’s the deal: You’re acting like a racist yourself by generally labeling all conservatives as racist. That’s because the majority of Republicans in this country are not black. I’m not black, and I’m one of the most faithful and hardcore conservatives you’d ever meet. But that does not mean I don’t like Obama because he’s not wholly white.

I don’t like him because his entire belief system – politically and personally – is hostile toward America and Americans, and their legacy. He’s one of the most liberal politicians to ever serve anywhere in Washington, and that makes him a political enemy of mine. I do not like him, and I would not like him if he were a white president – just like I did not like Bill Clinton.

So, Mr. King, you can take your generalizations and kiss my ass. Is that hostile enough for you?

Wilson Treats Obama The Way Dems Treat Bush

I will not condemn South Carolina Rep. Joe Wilson for calling Obama a liar Wednesday night during the president’s address to Congress.

And I will not condemn him not because it was the appropriate place for such a declaration – it was not – and not because the timing was good – it was awful –  but because Wilson was speaking the truth.

And it was loud and clear. Of course, the ass clowns in the radical left media have predictably demonized and mocked Wilson, just like they do anyone and everyone who don’t see things their way.

Here’s a sampling from mrc.org:

—MIKE BARNICLE: The insult heard ‘round the world! Let’s play Hardball! Good evening. I’m Mike Barnicle in for Chris Matthews. Leading off tonight, the gift. When Congressman Joe Wilson shouted, “You lie!” at President Obama last night he gave the Democrats a gift they hope just keeps on giving. Wilson was forced – and that does seem to be the word, forced – to apologize today. And his Washington office has been mobbed mostly by right wing supporters. Democrats hope to turn Wilson into the Cindy Sheehan of the anti-health care reform movement. A clownish figure of ridicule who hurts his own side, more than he helps.

—During the 4PM ET hour of live coverage on MSNBC Thursday, co-host David Shuster denounced the behavior of Republicans at President Obama’s address to Congress, declaring: “You look at the image of the Republican Party, all white males with short haircuts. They look sort of angry. No women, no minorities, and it looks like they’ve sort of become unhinged.”

Shuster and co-host Tamron Hall moderated a debate between Democratic strategist Patrick Murphy and Republican strategist Alex Conant, over the impact of Republican Congressman Joe Wilson shouting out ‘you lie!’ during the President’s speech. Shuster claimed: “The video of the Republican lawmakers was almost as striking as the speech itself….Did the Republican image change last night for the worse or was it something minor that may have only had an impact on the conservative base that was energized and wants to kill reform?”

Following the discussion, Hall observed: “…this pride in being an American and what it means to have class in this country and to see something like that. It is hurtful when you know that it is a prestigious place we have in this world and when we are reduced to behavior like that, it is very telling to all of us. We love this country and it is hurtful to see someone play out their – their emotions in such a loser way – I think I can say that.” Shuster replied: “Tamron you said it perfectly. I agree with you 100%.” Hall admitted: “I don’t think my mother would like I said loser, but oh well.”

—ABC’s Terry Moran on Wednesday hyperbolically spun Barack Obama’s congressional speech as a “bold call to action” and theatrically visualized, “There was another ghost in the chamber tonight, the spirit of Senator Ted Kennedy, who fought for decades for universal care.“

Earlier in the Nightline segment, which recapped the President’s health care address, the co-anchor introduced his political revision of A Christmas Carol: “Yes, there were ghosts in that chamber tonight. The other Presidents who tried to reform the health care system and failed.”

After discussing the outburst by South Carolina Congressman Joe Wilson, who accused the President of being a liar, Moran declared, “The President simply moved on. Focusing on his message. Trying to take the high road. Leaving Wilson and others behind.”

The President tried to take the high road? Although it’s only partially in Moran’s segment, Obama made this comment clearly aimed at Sarah Palin: “-That we plan to set up panels of bureaucrats with the power to kill off senior citizens. Now, such a charge would be laughable if it weren’t so cynical and irresponsible. It is a lie, plain and simple.” So, Representative Wilson calling the President a liar is in poor taste? But, Obama doing the same thing to Palin is the “high road?”

Moran’s tone was constant throughout the piece. He opened the segment by trumpeting, “President Obama delivers a bold call to action on health care, challenging his Republican opponents to stop what he calls the scare tactics and telling lawmakers the time to act is now.” He later declared the speech was a “urgent call to action, one that bluntly even emotionally challenged what he called the scare tactics of some of his Republican opponents.”

Repeating White House talking points, Moran parroted, “The plan itself, the President claimed, will deliver what polls show Americans want- security and stability in health care, the end of those nightmares [extreme difficulties dealing with insurance companies].” Of course, the anchor could have cited polls, such as Rasmussen, that now show 53 percent of Americans oppose Obama’s proposal for government-run health care.

—ABC correspondent Jake Tapper on Thursday condescendingly described Barack Obama’s address to Congress this way: “At times, it was almost like the President were a principal and Congress a bunch of unruly school kids.” The usually restrained reporter announced, “He [Obama] made outreach to his conservative opponents, while also refuting many of their ideas.”

Refuted? Wouldn’t challenged or attacked have been the neutral description? Tapper also repeated that Obama “blames misinformation for why many Americans are nervous about reform.” Good Morning America on Thursday ignored the AP’s fact check from the previous night that debunked some of the things the President supposedly “refuted:” 

President Barack Obama used only-in-Washington accounting Wednesday when he promised to overhaul the nation’s health care system without adding “one dime” to the deficit. By conventional arithmetic, Democratic plans would drive up the deficit by billions of dollars.

The president’s speech to Congress contained a variety of oversimplifications and omissions in laying out what he wants to do about health insurance. A look at some of Obama’s claims and how they square with the facts or the fuller story:

…

OBAMA: “Nothing in this plan will require you or your employer to change the coverage or the doctor you have.”

THE FACTS: That’s correct, as far as it goes. But neither can the plan guarantee that people can keep their current coverage. Employers sponsor coverage for most families, and they’d be free to change their health plans in ways that workers may not like, or drop insurance altogether. The Congressional Budget Office analyzed the health care bill written by House Democrats and said that by 2016 some 3 million people who now have employer-based care would lose it because their employers would decide to stop offering it.

The not-so-surprising reaction from the mainstream media that has its collective heads shoved so far up Obama’s ass the he can taste them is only a small part of the problem here.

It’s small because the left-wing press has been married to Democrats for a while now. Expecting it to criticize or question Obama or any other liberal is like trying to convince the New York Times to love America. Neither is going to happen.

So, what we’ve got here is high hypocrisy from Democrats in their response to Wilson’s attack on Obama. Where was the outrage when liberals were endlessly accusing, assaulting, demonizing, and mocking President Bush? Where was the anger when liberal politicians called Bush a liar every day of his presidency?

And where were they Wednesday night when Obama called opponents of his socializled health-care plan liars? Where were they when he called Sarah Palin a liar?

As I’ve said so many times before, liberals have one set of standards for themselves and another for everyone else. Because of a severe mental illness suffered by all liberals, they are inherently incapable of living on the same plane of existence as the rest of us. Indeed, they are diffferent from us – but for all the wrong reasons.

And wrong is the appropriate word to describe these people, because they just don’t do much right and good for society. They are destructful, especially as politicians. They’re hateful, brutal. Oh, and as irony would have it, they’re liars.

That’s what so hard to stomach about this whole Joe Wilson thing. Wilson, as inappropriate as it was for him to pick that moment to call Obama out, was absolutely right to make the assertion. More Republicans should be doing the same but, unfortunately, the party still has a bunch of cowards and sissies running around Capitol Hill, contributing nothing to the GOP resurgence.

They are the reason Republicans don’t have control of the House, Senate, and White House today. They are the same ones who rushed to judge Wilson for his outburst. They are the ones who refused to go after Obama for his evil associations, gross incompetency, and inexperience during the presidential campaign because they didn’t want to come across as racist or unAmerican.

Pansies.

Still, pansies are always going to be willing participants in politics. But this GOP needs to quickly find a way to lessen their damning influence on the party. It owes it to Wilson – and every other real American – to pull this nation out of Obama the socialist’s evil grip.

Republicans should have destroyed Obama by now. The president should be done, his ticket punched for a one-term presidency that ends in utter failure. Same goes for Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi – the terrible twosome that takes joy in bringing down a country and marvels at the mere sight of Obama. Couple of kiss-asses, is what they are.

Anyway, it’s their kind who needs to just go home and stay there, being careful not to ever re-enter society for any reason.  They’ve proven to be a national security risk.

As for Wilson’s critics, well, fuck off. Let us real Americans get back to the work of taking our country back.

You hypocrites.

Anti-Idiotarian Rottweiler: Obama’s Vetting Excuse A Big Lie

More Van Jones commentary from conservative blogger nicedoggie.net:

Apparently the new meme is that our Lord and Savior, Obamandias, can’t really be blamed for his consistent choice of far-left radicals for just about every position he could think of. Why? Because his “vetters” didn’t do their jobs.

Could we lay that one to rest, please?

When it comes to “vetting” anybody who is likely to be even remotely allowed access to the president of the United States, and certainly a CommisCzar, the Secret Service takes care of it. Still feeling a pain in your butt from having the FBI crawl around there to clear you for a CHL? Try getting access to the POTUS. If you’ve as much as pissed on a sidewalk in public view, you can forget about getting anywhere near the president. The Secret Service takes their job seriously, as well they should, because if they didn’t, they’d be unable to do their job, which is to protect the president of the United States, whoever that might be.

So you can rest assured that the Secret Service were well aware of, say, Van Jones’ connections to radical groups, not to mention his two prior arrests, and you can rest equally assured that they would have filed their protests accordingly.

So who’s the only person who can override the “nix” of the Secret Service when it comes to protecting the POTUS?

I know. Hard question, isn’t it?

So please, please spare me the nonsense that Il Douche didn’t know. He knew full well, because he was briefed, very thoroughly, on it. Because that’s the Secret Service’s job. And he overruled it. Because he loves his radical lefties such as Rev. Wrong, Bill Ayers, Saul Alinsky etc. He loves them. They were the ones who formed him, after all.

You really believe that the Secret Service didn’t know that Van Jones had signed a petition blaming George W. Bush for the 9/11 attacks. You really believe that they didn’t know about his prior arrests? Are you really that stupid?

They knew alright and, as is their duty, they informed the president of it.

Guess just who told them to go fuck themselves and stuff their findings?

All Hail Obamandias, King of Kings.

American Thinker: Obama Advisor’s Radicalism No Big Deal To Liberals

This from americanthinker.com on the left’s anger over the resignation of Obama official Van Jones:

 

I am getting old.

I’ll be 56 in January and I realize that the days behind me are beginning to far outnumber the days before me. I have lived a lot of history in those years and have seen just about everything in politics imaginable; huge upsets, the triumph and fall of conservatism, a presidential resignation, culture wars – exciting times to have lived.

But I will never understand this:

 

Van Jones was one of the good guys. A really, really good guy. He used his education and his passion to combat police brutality and the massive, wasteful incarceration of so many of this nation’s young, brown people. Having fought in the trenches for so long, he saw an opportunity to build hope and jobs and tangible communities as the world responds to the climate crisis. He connected the dots and inspired action and had a vision. He was the rare outsider who got a chance to move inside, and move he did.

This same blogger referred to health care opponents as “psychological terrorists.

And then there’s this from Keith Olberman:

 

I don’t know why I’ve got this phrasing in my head, but: Find everything you can about Glenn Beck,  Stu Burguiere, and Roger Ailes.

No, even now, I refuse to go all caps.

No, sending me links to the last two Countdowns with my own de-constructions of his biblical vision quality Communist/Fascist/Socialist/Zimbalist art at Rockefeller Center (where, curiously, he works, Comrade) doesn’t count. Nor does sending me links to  specious inappropriate point-underscoring prove-you’re-innocent made-up rumors.

Tuesday we will expand this to the television audience and have a dedicated email address to accept leads, tips, contacts, on Beck, his radio producer Burguiere, and the chief of his tv enablers, Ailes (even though Ailes’ power was desperately undercut when he failed to pull off his phony “truce” push).

And what in God’s name is Jane Hamsher so riled up about?

 

Now he’s been thrown under the bus by the White House for signing his name to a petition expressing something that 35% of all Democrats believed as of 2007 — that George Bush knew in advance about the attacks of 9/11.  Well, that and calling Republicans “assholes.”  I’m pretty sure that if you search through the histories of every single liberal leader at the CAF dinner that night, they have publicly said that and worse.

So where are all the statements defending Van Jones by those who were willing to exploit him when it served their purpose?  Why aren’t they standing up  and defending one of their own, who has done nothing that probably the majority of people in the Democratic party haven’t done at one time or another?  Is he no longer “one of their own?”

What has me so perplexed this morning is that these liberals and other Democrats are upset that this racist conspiracy mongering Truther is out of a responsible position in government.

It just absolutely boggles my mind that these and most other Democrats have no problem with a guy who is an admitted Communist (“Former” communist? Would that be anything like a “former” racist like Strom Thurmond, Trent Lott, and other conservatives?), a man who pushed the conspiracy theory that white people want to deliberately murder black people by degrading the environment in the ghetto, who supports the cop-killer Mumia, and who signed a 9/11 Truther petition, claiming he didn’t know what he was signing thus making him a liar or an idiot.

They are defending this crackpot?

I don’t see how anyone can rationalize support for someone that the overwhelming majority of American people would agree is unfit to serve in any capacity in government. Forget Glenn Beck and Fox News. This guy was hoisted on his own petard of far left, radical statements and beliefs. For me, it had nothing to do with calling Republicans “a-holes.” I refer to many GOP’ers in such colorful language frequently.” But I draw the line at those who see shadows in the mist around every corner in America. There is no place in government for those whose minds have been captured by paranoid conspiracy theories. Such thinking colors everything else they believe and as such, interferes with sound judgment – a prerequisite for serving the people.

The Jones fiasco highlights how “movement liberalism” is so out of touch with ordinary people – treating those of us in flyover country with such nauseating contempt – that they are totally blind to the sensibilities of the majority.

The American people tolerate a lot in their politicians – in both parties. But they will not put up with conspiracy mongering communists. That’s a bridge too far and Obama and the left should have realized that before putting Jones up for such a prominent position in government.

Right-Wing Extremist Views: Installment No. 10

—Robert Gibbs needs to find a new job. He really sucks at the one he has now.

—Do you think he is filled with that much hatred, or has Obama simply brainwashed him?

—Obama’s supporters are still pretty damn protective of him – like a high-school football player who just started dating the varsity cheerleader slut.

—I thought Obama was going to usher in an era of utopia. It hasn’t happened yet. Does this mean it’s going to take longer than expected, or is he just a liar?

—Harry Reid is going around the country wishing failure on everyone and everything. If I didn’t know better, I’d think the guy just needs to throw himself off a 76-story building and take one for the team. He’s got to  be one miserable son-of-a-bitch. And he looks hideous, to boot.

—I would say the same for Nancy Pelosi. But her story is just too damn tragic to wish that kind of horror on her. Instead, I suggest life therapy. She really sucks at life.

—The unemployment rate is damn near 10 percent. Obama should take credit for that.

—By the way, what happened to all that stimulus hype?

—Obama just returned from a family vacation. That bastard. How could he go on vacation when American soldiers are dying in Afghanistan?

—See? I can do it, too. Thanks, you stupid liberals.

—I haven’t heard anything about the Obama family pooch lately. What has happened to journalism in this country?

—The Associated Press, not exactly a picture of journalistic integrity these days, was blasted Friday after publishing a photo of a mortally wounded U.S. soldier in Afghanistan against the wishes of the Pentagon and the hero’s family. Being a 15-year journalist and editor myself, I would not have run the photo. Those who decided to circulate the AP image and those newspaper editors who decided to use it deserve to be smacked across their faces for gross indecency. Assholes.

—The White House is said to be drafting its own health-care reform plan, and Dems, of course, are pushing for the public option. I have a better idea, Mr. President. You and all your dumbass staff members walk out of the White House right now and never come back, and we’ll call it even.

—Van Jones, one of Obama’s 4,521 government czars, is under GOP pressure to resign after reports surfaced he was linked to a “truther” group that believed 9-11 was an inside job and that he mocked President Bush as a “crackhead trying to lick crackpipe for a fix.”

The fact someone like Jones is in Obama’s administration shouldn’t shock anyone. The president likes to hang out with socialists, communists, domestic terrorists, and thugs. Oh, and he accepts gifts from people like Hugo Chavez. Jones is just another lowlife in Obama’s circle of lowlife punks.

White House Vilifies School Districts Over Reaction To Obama Speech

This is how Obama and his henchmen respond to their critics. They demonize them, speak ill of them, mock them, laugh them off.

Take White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs’ reponse to many of the nation’s school districts criticizing Obama’s direct speech to students scheduled for Sept. 8:

“”I think we’ve reached a little bit of the silly season when the president of the United States can’t tell kids in school to study hard and stay in school. Look, there are some school districts that won’t let you read ‘Huckleberry Finn.’”

Many districts have refused to force students to watch the webcast, mainly  because it is an intrusion on their class schedules and because parents take exception to the president of the United States dictating what their kids do while at school.

However, the same districts are recording the speech and giving students the option of watching it later, or are allowing teachers to incorporate the president’s address into curriculum.

Regardless, no president – Republican or Democrat – should address students like this. Gibbs and Obama’s still-giddy yet blind supporters insist all he is doing is telling them to work hard, study, and set goals. If that is the case, the speech isn’t necessary at all.

Students hear that same message every day of their lives – from teachers, principals, counselors, parents, grandparents, friends, boyfriends, girlfriends, doctors, pastors, Sunday school teachers, youth ministers. It is driven into their consciousness over their entire student careers. And that makes Obama’s speech utterly pointless.

Parents and others believe the president is pushing his massively liberal political agenda, forcing it down the collective throats of the nation’s student body. Obama is a lowlife, but I don’t know that he’s so low he would use school kids to advance his presidency. I am sure, though, his ego affords him the capability to do so.

Whatever his intentions, they’re wrong. But that shouldn’t be surprising, because a precious few of his decisions since that travesty of an election in November  have been the right ones.

The White House’s motivation notwithstanding, its attacks on school districts across America are baseless. That shouldn’t be surprising either, though, because Obama has shown a great penchant for trying to minimize and illegitimize his opponents, regardless of the subject matter.

Take the outrage from the average American over his health-care aspirations. The White House and its liberal agents called the opposition fake and manufactured, going so far as to suggesting those who do not support socialized medicine are not patriotic.

This is how the Obama White House and liberals explain away opposition. They demonize people and set up a Web page allowing their neighbors to report “suspicious” behavior. That site has since been disabled, but it speaks volumes about the government’s determination to silence and demoralize anyone who thinks and believes differently.

This administration is a monumental failure and should thus be attacked like it has attacked us.

Ass clowns.