Obama’s Enemies List: It’s Long
Conservative blogger IMAO has obtained Obama’s official enemies list. Here it is:
* FOX News
* Rush Limbaugh
* Glenn Beck
* Jake Tapper
* General McChrystal
* Joe Biden’s mouth
* The economy
* Brazil
* The Jews
* That guy at Starbuck’s who is always screwing up my order
* The dwarf planet Eris
* Optimus Prime
* Blue pens
* Malia Obama
* All other Nobel Peace Prize winners
* Jesus
* Capitalism
* Liberty
* The Constitution
* Americans
Get a healthy dose of conservative awesomeness at imao.us.
FoxNews Channel Continues To Dominate In Ratings

Some good news for the FoxNews Channel.
And incredibly, the story is in the America-hating, conservative-detesting New York Times.
Bill Carter on Monday reported the network that Obama hates with all his evil soul is destroying CNN and MSNBC in the ratings. In fact, the story says, CNN is dead-last in the ratings, with FoxNews dominating the cable-news industry.
That, of course, is no surprise. The network that keeps liberals and other conservative-hating pricks up at night is far superior to all the others. FoxNews covers stories the other Obama-worshipping networks ignore. It asks questions the others refuse to ask. It investigates stories the others mock.
How the network covers the news is one thing, its opinion shows another. Those opinion shows are what Obama despises so much. Mostly, the hosts are either conservative or conservative-leaning, including Bill O’Reilly, Sean Hannity, and Glenn Beck.
And we all know how much they oppose Obama.
And we know, too, how much Obama hates criticism.
So the man whose feelings get hurt faster than a baby who loses his security blanket started hitting the FoxNews Channel hard, actually directing his henchmen to attack the network’s legitimacy and trying to get the lesser networks to shun the right-wing extremist media organization.
The attacks didn’t work. They made the president look like a bigger asshole than he already is. Made him look foolish, childish. Made him look a damned dictator. An oppressor.
Meanwhile, FoxNews continues to thrive. Its audience has remained faithful, and the tiny segment of the cable-news market that’s dedicated to CNN, MSNBC, and other networks remain true to them. Those followers are called liberals, the kind of people to whom the mainstream media caters.
But to some brain-dead media representatives (only a few remain in the industry who have not fried their brains on Obama worship and liberal idolatry), FoxNews is exactly what Obama has described: a right-wing organization that doesn’t deserve to be included among media giants.
Take this, for example, from CNBC contributor Michae Wolff:
“It’s like what the conservatives and the Republicans did to Democrats,” Wolff told MSNBC’s Chris Matthews. “They said everyone is a liberal. You’re a liberal. You’re a liberal … and essentially, what they’re doing is flipping that back and saying, ‘You’re Fox. Oh, you mean like Fox. Oh, you’re echoing the Fox opinion.’ And the truth is, Fox is not very popular in this country. It may have great ratings, but still we’re talking under 2 million people. It’s a really marginal, somewhat extreme presence in the United States.”
Ok, that’s just stupid. But then again, you have to be stupid to actually patronize a piece of shit like Matthews. I mean, the guy is nothing more than a mouthpiece for the Obama White House and all things liberal. This is a guy who actually admitted getting chills up his legs at the mere sight of the president. He’s either exceedingly gay or has some kind of neurological issue that has tragically gone undiagnosed for quite some time.
Sadly enough, Matthews isn’t alone in his quest to rule the world from a stictly liberal perspective. To mentally challenged people like Matthews, nothing matters except liberalism and condemning to Hell those bad, bad conservatives, with their wicked family values, love of country, and worship of the Almighty God.
According to mrc.org:
—On Sunday’s CBS Evening News, political analyst John Dickerson brushed aside criticism from former Vice President Dick Cheney that the Obama administration was “dithering” on Afghanistan: “…it puts Cheney out there as a kind of boogie man the administration can point to. He’s not terribly popular outside of conservative circles…in some ways, Dick Cheney is a gift for the White House.”
—Good Morning America co-host Diane Sawyer on Tuesday helped promote an upcoming HBO documentary on Barack Obama and allowed producer Ed Norton to gush over the “zen” presidential campaign of the Democratic candidate. Sawyer breathlessly teased the program as “the Obamas behind closed doors. The grandmother who raised him and the man you’ve never seen.”
Sawyer played several clips of the By the People: The Election of Barack Obama, a film that followed Obama and his family during the 2008 campaign. The segment, which ran six and a half minutes, will be supplemented by more promotion on Tuesday’s Nightline. When asked what surprised her about the Obamas, director Amy Rice enthused about “just how normal they were.”
Norton was impressed with the “calm,” “no-drama Obama.” The actor continued, “And in a weird way, when you look behind the curtain with that team, they are really zen. It’s amazing how zen they are.”
One could almost predict the desperately “current” New York Times editor/columnist Frank Rich would devote his Sunday column to try and make Balloon Boy an anti-Republican symbol of something or other, and he doesn’t disappoint.
The result, “In Defense of the ‘Balloon Boy’ Dad,” is even more silly than Rich’s usual fare, playing devil’s advocate for storm-chasing father Richard Heene. Rich found “some poignancy in [Heene's] determination to grab what he and many others see as among the last accessible scraps of the American dream….If Heene’s balloon was empty, so were the toxic financial instruments, inflated by the thin air of unsupported debt, that cratered the economy he inhabits.” Rich is being serious.
Certainly the “balloon boy” incident is a reflection of our time — much as the radio-induced “War of the Worlds” panic dramatized America’s jitters on the eve of World War II, or the national preoccupation with the now-forgotten Congressman Gary Condit signaled America’s pre-9/11 drift into escapism and complacency in the summer of 2001. But to see what “balloon boy” says about 2009, you have to look past the sentimental moral absolutes. You have to muster some sympathy for the devil of the piece, the Bad Dad.
Nine months into Obama’s presidency, everything is still officially about Bush:
Next to the other hoaxes and fantasies that have been abetted by the news media in recent years, both the “balloon boy” and Chamber of Commerce ruses are benign. The Colorado balloon may have led to the rerouting of flights and the wasteful deployment of law enforcement resources. But at least it didn’t lead the country into fiasco the way George W. Bush’s flyboy spectacle on an aircraft carrier helped beguile most of the Beltway press and too much of the public into believing that the mission had been accomplished in Iraq.
And from others:
—Mark Penn at politico.com:
Republicans suggest that the aggressive move by the Obama White House to take on people and organizations that disagree with it and oppose its policies is an unprecedented abuse of government resources.
This is, of course, nonsense.
The Obama team is engaged in a series of tough legislative and press battles and is stepping up its game, not stepping over the line. And the actions taken by the White House are mild and pale compared with those of the Gingrich and Bush years.
Meanwhile, FoxNews Channel’s ratings are up 10 percent. Obama’s approval ratings are falling faster than Bill Clinton’s pants.
Sweet justice.
Anti-Idiotarian Rottweiler: Obama’s Vetting Excuse A Big Lie
More Van Jones commentary from conservative blogger nicedoggie.net:
Apparently the new meme is that our Lord and Savior, Obamandias, can’t really be blamed for his consistent choice of far-left radicals for just about every position he could think of. Why? Because his “vetters” didn’t do their jobs.
Could we lay that one to rest, please?
When it comes to “vetting” anybody who is likely to be even remotely allowed access to the president of the United States, and certainly a CommisCzar, the Secret Service takes care of it. Still feeling a pain in your butt from having the FBI crawl around there to clear you for a CHL? Try getting access to the POTUS. If you’ve as much as pissed on a sidewalk in public view, you can forget about getting anywhere near the president. The Secret Service takes their job seriously, as well they should, because if they didn’t, they’d be unable to do their job, which is to protect the president of the United States, whoever that might be.
So you can rest assured that the Secret Service were well aware of, say, Van Jones’ connections to radical groups, not to mention his two prior arrests, and you can rest equally assured that they would have filed their protests accordingly.
So who’s the only person who can override the “nix” of the Secret Service when it comes to protecting the POTUS?
I know. Hard question, isn’t it?
So please, please spare me the nonsense that Il Douche didn’t know. He knew full well, because he was briefed, very thoroughly, on it. Because that’s the Secret Service’s job. And he overruled it. Because he loves his radical lefties such as Rev. Wrong, Bill Ayers, Saul Alinsky etc. He loves them. They were the ones who formed him, after all.
You really believe that the Secret Service didn’t know that Van Jones had signed a petition blaming George W. Bush for the 9/11 attacks. You really believe that they didn’t know about his prior arrests? Are you really that stupid?
They knew alright and, as is their duty, they informed the president of it.
Guess just who told them to go fuck themselves and stuff their findings?
All Hail Obamandias, King of Kings.
American Thinker: Obama Advisor’s Radicalism No Big Deal To Liberals
This from americanthinker.com on the left’s anger over the resignation of Obama official Van Jones:
I’ll be 56 in January and I realize that the days behind me are beginning to far outnumber the days before me. I have lived a lot of history in those years and have seen just about everything in politics imaginable; huge upsets, the triumph and fall of conservatism, a presidential resignation, culture wars – exciting times to have lived.
But I will never understand this:
Van Jones was one of the good guys. A really, really good guy. He used his education and his passion to combat police brutality and the massive, wasteful incarceration of so many of this nation’s young, brown people. Having fought in the trenches for so long, he saw an opportunity to build hope and jobs and tangible communities as the world responds to the climate crisis. He connected the dots and inspired action and had a vision. He was the rare outsider who got a chance to move inside, and move he did.
This same blogger referred to health care opponents as “psychological terrorists.
And then there’s this from Keith Olberman:
I don’t know why I’ve got this phrasing in my head, but: Find everything you can about Glenn Beck, Stu Burguiere, and Roger Ailes.No, even now, I refuse to go all caps.
No, sending me links to the last two Countdowns with my own de-constructions of his biblical vision quality Communist/Fascist/Socialist/Zimbalist art at Rockefeller Center (where, curiously, he works, Comrade) doesn’t count. Nor does sending me links to specious inappropriate point-underscoring prove-you’re-innocent made-up rumors.
Tuesday we will expand this to the television audience and have a dedicated email address to accept leads, tips, contacts, on Beck, his radio producer Burguiere, and the chief of his tv enablers, Ailes (even though Ailes’ power was desperately undercut when he failed to pull off his phony “truce” push).
And what in God’s name is Jane Hamsher so riled up about?
Now he’s been thrown under the bus by the White House for signing his name to a petition expressing something that 35% of all Democrats believed as of 2007 — that George Bush knew in advance about the attacks of 9/11. Well, that and calling Republicans “assholes.” I’m pretty sure that if you search through the histories of every single liberal leader at the CAF dinner that night, they have publicly said that and worse.So where are all the statements defending Van Jones by those who were willing to exploit him when it served their purpose? Why aren’t they standing up and defending one of their own, who has done nothing that probably the majority of people in the Democratic party haven’t done at one time or another? Is he no longer “one of their own?”
What has me so perplexed this morning is that these liberals and other Democrats are upset that this racist conspiracy mongering Truther is out of a responsible position in government.
It just absolutely boggles my mind that these and most other Democrats have no problem with a guy who is an admitted Communist (“Former” communist? Would that be anything like a “former” racist like Strom Thurmond, Trent Lott, and other conservatives?), a man who pushed the conspiracy theory that white people want to deliberately murder black people by degrading the environment in the ghetto, who supports the cop-killer Mumia, and who signed a 9/11 Truther petition, claiming he didn’t know what he was signing thus making him a liar or an idiot.
They are defending this crackpot?
I don’t see how anyone can rationalize support for someone that the overwhelming majority of American people would agree is unfit to serve in any capacity in government. Forget Glenn Beck and Fox News. This guy was hoisted on his own petard of far left, radical statements and beliefs. For me, it had nothing to do with calling Republicans “a-holes.” I refer to many GOP’ers in such colorful language frequently.” But I draw the line at those who see shadows in the mist around every corner in America. There is no place in government for those whose minds have been captured by paranoid conspiracy theories. Such thinking colors everything else they believe and as such, interferes with sound judgment – a prerequisite for serving the people.
The Jones fiasco highlights how “movement liberalism” is so out of touch with ordinary people – treating those of us in flyover country with such nauseating contempt – that they are totally blind to the sensibilities of the majority.
The American people tolerate a lot in their politicians – in both parties. But they will not put up with conspiracy mongering communists. That’s a bridge too far and Obama and the left should have realized that before putting Jones up for such a prominent position in government.
Right-Wing Extremist Views: Installment No. 10
—Robert Gibbs needs to find a new job. He really sucks at the one he has now.
—Do you think he is filled with that much hatred, or has Obama simply brainwashed him?
—Obama’s supporters are still pretty damn protective of him – like a high-school football player who just started dating the varsity cheerleader slut.
—I thought Obama was going to usher in an era of utopia. It hasn’t happened yet. Does this mean it’s going to take longer than expected, or is he just a liar?
—Harry Reid is going around the country wishing failure on everyone and everything. If I didn’t know better, I’d think the guy just needs to throw himself off a 76-story building and take one for the team. He’s got to be one miserable son-of-a-bitch. And he looks hideous, to boot.
—I would say the same for Nancy Pelosi. But her story is just too damn tragic to wish that kind of horror on her. Instead, I suggest life therapy. She really sucks at life.
—The unemployment rate is damn near 10 percent. Obama should take credit for that.
—By the way, what happened to all that stimulus hype?
—Obama just returned from a family vacation. That bastard. How could he go on vacation when American soldiers are dying in Afghanistan?
—See? I can do it, too. Thanks, you stupid liberals.
—I haven’t heard anything about the Obama family pooch lately. What has happened to journalism in this country?
—The Associated Press, not exactly a picture of journalistic integrity these days, was blasted Friday after publishing a photo of a mortally wounded U.S. soldier in Afghanistan against the wishes of the Pentagon and the hero’s family. Being a 15-year journalist and editor myself, I would not have run the photo. Those who decided to circulate the AP image and those newspaper editors who decided to use it deserve to be smacked across their faces for gross indecency. Assholes.
—The White House is said to be drafting its own health-care reform plan, and Dems, of course, are pushing for the public option. I have a better idea, Mr. President. You and all your dumbass staff members walk out of the White House right now and never come back, and we’ll call it even.
—Van Jones, one of Obama’s 4,521 government czars, is under GOP pressure to resign after reports surfaced he was linked to a “truther” group that believed 9-11 was an inside job and that he mocked President Bush as a “crackhead trying to lick crackpipe for a fix.”
The fact someone like Jones is in Obama’s administration shouldn’t shock anyone. The president likes to hang out with socialists, communists, domestic terrorists, and thugs. Oh, and he accepts gifts from people like Hugo Chavez. Jones is just another lowlife in Obama’s circle of lowlife punks.
White House Vilifies School Districts Over Reaction To Obama Speech
This is how Obama and his henchmen respond to their critics. They demonize them, speak ill of them, mock them, laugh them off.
Take White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs’ reponse to many of the nation’s school districts criticizing Obama’s direct speech to students scheduled for Sept. 8:
“”I think we’ve reached a little bit of the silly season when the president of the United States can’t tell kids in school to study hard and stay in school. Look, there are some school districts that won’t let you read ‘Huckleberry Finn.’”
Many districts have refused to force students to watch the webcast, mainly because it is an intrusion on their class schedules and because parents take exception to the president of the United States dictating what their kids do while at school.
However, the same districts are recording the speech and giving students the option of watching it later, or are allowing teachers to incorporate the president’s address into curriculum.
Regardless, no president – Republican or Democrat – should address students like this. Gibbs and Obama’s still-giddy yet blind supporters insist all he is doing is telling them to work hard, study, and set goals. If that is the case, the speech isn’t necessary at all.
Students hear that same message every day of their lives – from teachers, principals, counselors, parents, grandparents, friends, boyfriends, girlfriends, doctors, pastors, Sunday school teachers, youth ministers. It is driven into their consciousness over their entire student careers. And that makes Obama’s speech utterly pointless.
Parents and others believe the president is pushing his massively liberal political agenda, forcing it down the collective throats of the nation’s student body. Obama is a lowlife, but I don’t know that he’s so low he would use school kids to advance his presidency. I am sure, though, his ego affords him the capability to do so.
Whatever his intentions, they’re wrong. But that shouldn’t be surprising, because a precious few of his decisions since that travesty of an election in November have been the right ones.
The White House’s motivation notwithstanding, its attacks on school districts across America are baseless. That shouldn’t be surprising either, though, because Obama has shown a great penchant for trying to minimize and illegitimize his opponents, regardless of the subject matter.
Take the outrage from the average American over his health-care aspirations. The White House and its liberal agents called the opposition fake and manufactured, going so far as to suggesting those who do not support socialized medicine are not patriotic.
This is how the Obama White House and liberals explain away opposition. They demonize people and set up a Web page allowing their neighbors to report “suspicious” behavior. That site has since been disabled, but it speaks volumes about the government’s determination to silence and demoralize anyone who thinks and believes differently.
This administration is a monumental failure and should thus be attacked like it has attacked us.
Ass clowns.